New York Knicks: Pros and cons of trading Enes Kanter to Kings

Pro: The future rightfully takes precedence in rotation-clearing move

While a return package could leave something to be desired, the New York Knicks will continue their youth movement with trading Kanter to the Kings.

Fizdale already showed a preference for youth at center, with Kornet and Robinson’s respective opportunities. Once the Knicks have both players around, that will only increase.

A problematic three-center situation has been avoided for the past month, as Robinson rehabs ankle and groin injuries. Kornet was out of the rotation beforehand, but as he established a three-point presence for the Knicks, it crowded this position.

Fizdale, if Kanter remains on the roster when Robinson returns, has a decision to make on playing. He already confirmed the veteran center will have a role no matter what, per the New York Post, but it’s difficult to think this player’s happiness increases.

Sending Kanter to Sacramento dodges this balancing act. Randolph or another Kings’ big man should not impact this, especially if a buyout follows.

Kornet and Robinson receive their extended opportunities to shine, showing they can fit into the Knicks’ long-term plans. They stand a better chance at this than Kanter, even with the Vanderbilt product’s expiring contract.

New York also has a general rotation logjam. It may even help someone receiving little playing time, like Lance Thomas, showcase themselves for a chance beyond 2018-19, whether with this organization or not.

Kanter is not part of the future, and the Knicks need this season’s final months to evaluate who fits. It’s clear he does not, so this deal opens avenues to travel this direction.